Environmental Advocates

Pace Law School Energy Project

Westchester People’s Action Coalition

 

For Immediate Release:

November 13, 2000

 

Contact:

Kyle Rabin – Environmental Advocates: 518-462-5526 ext. 240

Mark Jacobs – Westchester’s Peoples Action Coalition: 914-682-0488

 

Groups Call for Nuclear Whistleblower Protection

On the 26th Anniversary of Karen Silkwood’s Death

 

Karen Silkwood died on November 13, 1974 in a fatal one-car crash. Silkwood was a chemical technician at the Kerr-McGee plutonium fuels production plant in Crescent, Oklahoma and a member of the Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers International (OCAW) Union. Her discovery of falsified quality control data within inspection reports of nuclear fuel rods had vast implications for the health of the workers in the plant and the public at large. At the same time, Silkwood was involved in a number of unexplained exposures to plutonium. The circumstances of her death have been the subject of great speculation. An independent investigation provided convincing evidence that Silkwood’s car was struck from the rear and driven off the road causing her death.  Silkwood was on her way to deliver evidence to a member of the OCAW and an investigative reporter from the New York Times. Since then, her story has achieved worldwide fame as the subject of many books, magazine and newspaper articles, and even a major motion picture.

 

The saga of Karen Silkwood continued for years after her death. Her estate filed a civil suit against Kerr-McGee for alleged inadequate health and safety programs that led to her exposure to plutonium, one of the most toxic substances known to humankind. Silkwood’s case illustrated that government views of whistleblower disclosures are often deficient, compromised, or incomplete. Over these 26 years, some state governments have tried to increase protections for whistleblowers.

 

And now, in light of energy deregulation and the fiscal and structural changes are occurring in the nuclear power industry and the agency that regulates it, there is an even greater need for whistleblower protection, especially in New York State which is home to six commercial nuclear power plants.

 

According to Stephen M. Kohn – one of the nation's foremost experts on whistleblower law – New York State has one of the worst records with respect to providing adequate protection to all whistleblowers. The inadequacies of New York's “Whistleblower Statute,” which was passed in 1984, have led commentators to note that whistle­blower protection in New York is all but non-existent.

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has always admitted that it can only oversee a small portion of the industry’s safety issues and relies heavily on nuclear plant employees to identify potential safety problems to management and, if necessary, to the NRC.  Now, with deregulation, the NRC depends even more on workers at nuclear plants to be their “eyes and ears.” The NRC’s budget was slashed by $70 million between the years 1993 and 2000.  This has resulted in over 500 fewer personnel and a weaker reactor oversight process.

 

“Employees working at nuclear power plants should not feel pressured or intimidated by their supervisors in airing concerns about safety that may be expensive to remedy,” said Kyle Rabin, nuclear energy policy project director for the Albany-based Environmental Advocates.  “Sadly, we have witnessed the harassment of employees at New York nuclear power plants much too often,” Rabin added.  A recent example involved an employee at the New York Power Authority’s Indian Point 3 plant who had concerns about the facility’s corrective action process and its effectiveness in identifying problems and ensuring their timely resolution.  The employee, after raising safety concerns, was treated with such sustained abuse that she ultimately had to transfer out of her work group (Operations Review Group).

 

Nuclear plant employee health has also been threatened. Last fall, during a push by its owner, the New York Power Authority (NYPA), to dramatically reduce the length of a planned shutdown for refueling at the Indian Point 3 plant, worker safety was compromised. As a result of NYPA’s decision to relax protective clothing requirements, nearly 200 employees were radioactively contaminated. This came at a time when NYPA was involved in preliminary talks with Entergy Nuclear, Inc. over the sale of its two reactors. In an interview with New York City TV station WABC, a plant whistleblower explained: “There was a rush to get it done in [a company record of] 40 days and to impress the potential buyer of the plant.”

 

Rabin also noted that during the 2000 state legislative session, New York State Assemblyman Brodsky and Senator Morahan introduced legislation to create a Nuclear Whistleblower Access and Assistance Program.  This program – housed under the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority – contains a number of provisions including: (1) a requirement calling for the evaluation of nuclear whistleblower protection programs proposed by nuclear power plant operators, (2) the establishment of a toll-free telephone line available to employees of nuclear power plants that will offer advice regarding employee rights and protections pursuant to state and federal laws and present opportunities for access to senior management for purposes of communicating safety-related concerns, and (3) a requirement that a preliminary evaluation of any safety concern identified by an employee be performed within 72 hours. The bill unanimously passed the Assembly, but was not voted upon in the Senate.

 

 

-30-